Report Abuse

Use this form to report abuse on the Cross Rhythms website.

Name
Email address
Article Title:	Dawkins Delusion
Author of reported comment:	Mark Holdcroft
Comment Date:	09:12 on Mar 2 2007
Comment:	If I understand Paul Taylors position correctly, he is trying to emphasise the fact that, who is "reputable" is a subjective, rather than objective, opinion. A person or organisation is "reputable" if they have a proven track record of sharing the same values as your own. To Dawkins, a scholar will be "reputable" if they have a track record of undermining the Bible. For AiG the opposite is true. Therefore Paul Taylor is right to point out that Dawkins uses the word "reputable", in order to strenghen his argument, without presenting any clairfication as to why he labels them in this way.

Tell us the details of your complaint:
	For verification, please type the word shown above in the box below [try a different word]